Sublethal effects of cadmium on prey choice and capture efficiency in juvenile brook trout (<i>Salvelinus fontinalis</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prey choice in juvenile brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) was investigated under sublethal Cd stress in the presence of alternative prey types. Following 30-d exposures to either 0, 0.5, or 5.0 microg/L Cd, individual fish held in artificial stream channels were presented with both motile (Baetis tricaudatus) and nonmotile (Chironomus tentans) prey items and their foraging behavior and capture success was observed. The Cd-exposed trout were found to express a significant preference for C. tentans larvae as alternative prey to B. tricaudatus nymphs. Nevertheless, these preliminary findings indicate that, irrespective of prey choice, the capture efficiency of Cd-stressed trout declined by 20 to 55% with increasing Cd concentration when compared with control fish, and the activity of individual trout increased by 25% over controls, although these responses were not statistically significant. Cadmium significantly affected fish condition factors: The condition factor of control fish increased by 34% over the 30-d period, and Cd-exposed fish declined in condition by 12 to 18%. It is hypothesized that such a switch by fish to feeding on benthic prey under natural exposure conditions and their proximity to contaminated sediment may further exacerbate the sublethal effects of Cd on these individuals by intensifying or prolonging Cd exposure through a combination of trophic transfer and altered foraging behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".