Formation of appressoria by two species of lepidopteran-pathogenic Entomophthorales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fungal pathogens frequently form appressoria, specialized hyphal swellings on the surfaces of hosts. Production of appressoria by two entomophthoralean species that infect lepidopteran larvae, Entomophaga maimaiga Humber, Shimazu & Soper and Furia gastropachae (Raciborski) Filotas, Hajek & Humber, was investigated in vitro 68 h after conidial discharge. Entomophaga maimaiga appressoria were elongate, irregularly swollen structures located adjacent to the conidium or at the ends of short germ tubes. The highest percentages of appressoria were formed on hard surfaces such as polystyrene (21.5 ± 4.6%) and mylar (22.2 ± 4.3%). Nutrients or chemical stimuli were not required for appressorial formation but could stimulate growth as germ tubes. The contribution of surface hydrophobicity to appressorium formation was questionable; while appressoria were formed on hydrophobic surfaces, they were also formed to a lesser extent on glass, which is hydrophilic. When conidia of F. gastropachae were exposed to similar substrates and conditions, appressoria were never made, supporting the hypothesis that stimuli for appressorium formation can be species specific.Key words: appressorium, entomopathogenic fungi, infection process, Entomophthorales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".