Allotransplanted nerves regenerate inhibitory synapses on a crayfish muscle: Possible postsynaptic specification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Donor nerves of different origins, when transplanted onto a previously denervated adult crayfish abdominal superficial flexor muscle (SFM), regenerate excitatory synaptic connections. Here we report that an inhibitory axon in these nerves also regenerates synaptic connections based on observation of nerve terminals with irregular to elliptically shaped synaptic vesicles characteristic of the inhibitory axon in aldehyde fixed tissue. Inhibitory terminals were found at reinnervated sites in all 12 allotransplanted-SFMs, underscoring the fact that the inhibitory axon regenerates just as reliably as the excitatory axons. At sites with degenerating nerve terminals and at sparsely reinnervated sites, we observe densely stained membranes, reminiscent of postsynaptic membranes, but occurring as paired, opposing membranes, extending between extracellular channels of the subsynaptic reticulum. These structures are not found at richly innervated sites in allotransplanted SFMs, in control SFMs, or at several other crustacean muscles. Although their identity is unknown, they are likely to be remnant postsynaptic membranes that become paired with collapse of degenerated nerve terminals of excitatory and inhibitory axons. Because these two axons have uniquely different receptor channels and intramembrane structure, their remnant postsynaptic membranes may therefore attract regenerating nerve terminals to form synaptic contacts selectively by excitatory or inhibitory axons, resulting in postsynaptic specification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".