MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031720106 · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001333

PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity

2012· article· en· W2031720106 on OpenAlexafffund
Vivian Welch, Mark Petticrew, Peter Tugwell, David Moher, Jennifer O’Neill, Elizabeth Waters, Howard White

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Medicine · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOttawa Hospital
FundersUniversity of MelbourneUniversiteit StellenboschPan American Health OrganizationInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, BangladeshCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchImperial College LondonMedical Research CouncilLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineOttawa Hospital Research InstituteRockefeller FoundationUniversity of OttawaLoyola University ChicagoWorld Health Organization
KeywordsEquity (law)Health equitySystematic reviewMedicineActuarial scienceMEDLINEAccountingBusinessPolitical sciencePublic healthNursingLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PRISMA, preferred

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.436
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.754
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.4360.754
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0100.018
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0200.038
Bibliometrics0.0370.039
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0130.008
Open science0.0160.019
Research integrity0.0230.027
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.864
GPT teacher head0.587
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations714
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS MedicineSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207