MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031727979 · doi:10.1120/jacmp.v4i4.2504

Reduction of downtime and improvement of the utility of a conventional radiotherapy simulator

2003· article· en· W2031727979 on OpenAlexaff
S. Sawchuk, K. Knibutat, LEO MORIARITY

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDowntimeComputer scienceSimulationReduction (mathematics)Light fieldMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The modifications made to a radiotherapy simulator that improve its functionality and minimize its downtime are described. Functionality was enhanced with some simple effective improvements. Decreasing the frequency and time spent on repairs reduced downtime. These "in-house" improvements were made to a Varian Ximatron simulator at the Tom Baker Cancer Center. Now there is easier access to the field light and optical distance indicator (ODI). Projections of the field light and ODI are much brighter and ODI adjustment is more reproducible. A crosshair was etched onto the clear x-ray exit window to optically overlap with the crosshair of the reticule. Now, the time required to replace a field light is up to seven times faster and the time to realign a reticule is reduced to the order of three times faster. Only one quality control (QC) check is required after these adjustments. Removal of excess heat within the gantry head has eliminated two major problems: (A) the metal rod supporting the mirror assembly for the field light no longer expands and contracts causing a misalignment of the field light projection, and (B) the damage to the bearing in the cooling fan assembly has been eliminated. The simulator is now more functional and these improvements have reduced downtime significantly, making repairs and adjustments much more convenient and efficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Clinical Medical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207