MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031802588 · doi:10.1139/v06-086

The synthesis of butene glycol ethers with aluminium triflate

2006· article· en· W2031802588 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yvette M. Terblans, Michelle Huyser, Desmond A. Young, Michael J. Green

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Synthesis and Reactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSasol
KeywordsChemistryMethanolCatalysisPropanolTrifluoromethanesulfonateSelectivityButeneInorganic chemistry1-ButeneOrganic chemistryNuclear chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of aluminium triflate as a ring-opening catalyst for butene oxide (BuO) was evaluated in the presence of different alcohols such as methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, n-butanol, 2-propanol, 2-methyl-1-propanol, and 2-methyl-2-propanol. The reaction with methanol was studied kinetically by varying the temperature, catalyst concentration, and methanol – butene oxide molar ratio. These reactions yielded two major products (2-methoxy-1-butanol and 1-methoxy-2-butanol) in a approximate ratio of 1:1. It was noted that at low catalyst concentrations (<5 ppm), low temperatures (<90 °C), and a MeOH–BuO molar ratio of 8:1, the selectivity of the reaction could be kinetically manipulated to shift the product ratio towards 1-methoxy-2-butanol, the α-alkoxyalcohol. This result was confirmed by an experimental design program. Statistical calculations using the data from the experimental design identified a feasible region in which reactions with methanol could be carried out, which would lead to slightly higher selectivities to 1-methoxy-2-butanol. This region shows that the methanol – butene oxide ratio should be 8:1, the temperature between 80 and 85 °C, and the catalyst concentration between 3.9 and 5 ppm. These reaction conditions were used to carry out a test reaction with methanol and an extended series of alcohols. All the alcohols, except for 2-methyl-2-propanol, reacted with butene oxide under these conditions, with the selectivity to the α-alkoxyalcohol higher than to the β-alkoxyalcohol. To obtain a ring-opening reaction with 2-methyl-2-propanol, it was found that a higher catalyst concentration (approximately 10 ppm) and a lower alcohol – butene oxide ratio (6:1) at a temperature of 80 °C were necessary. This reaction led to a mixture of 1-tert-butoxy-2-butanol and 2-tert-butoxy-1-butanol with the selectivity to the α-alkoxyalcohol being somewhat higher because of the steric influence of the bulky tert-butoxy group.Key words: aluminium triflate, alcohols, butene oxide, ring opening, α-alkoxyalcohol, β-alkoxyalcohol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicChemical Synthesis and ReactionsFrench-language works237,207