Acute Exacerbation (Acute Lung Injury of Unknown Cause) in UIP and Other Forms of Fibrotic Interstitial Pneumonias
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acute exacerbation of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is a condition in which patients with UIP, and occasionally other forms of fibrotic interstitial lung disease, develop rapid respiratory failure, accompanied by extensive radiologic infiltrates. The pathologic features of this condition are ill-defined in the literature and the outcome is unclear. We report 12 such patients, 9 with underlying UIP, 2 with underlying fibrotic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, and 1 with underlying chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, who underwent surgical lung biopsy for diagnosis. High-resolution computed tomography data were available in 11 cases and showed the presence of extensive bilateral ground-glass opacities, sometimes accompanied by focal consolidation, superimposed on underlying fibrosis. Three microscopic patterns of acute lung injury were seen: diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), organizing pneumonia (OP), and a pattern of numerous very large fibroblast foci superimposed on underlying fibrosis. After the biopsy, all patients were treated with steroids, in some instances accompanied by cyclophosphamide or azathioprine. Ten patients survived the acute episode and were discharged with survival times of 1 to 11 months; of these cases, 6 showed a pattern of OP or OP plus extensive fibroblast foci; 2 a pattern of extensive fibroblast foci only; and 2 a pattern of DAD. Both patients who died had histologic DAD. We conclude that acute exacerbation of UIP and other fibrotic lung diseases produces a variety of pathologic patterns on biopsy, and that patients with OP or extensive fibroblast foci as the acute pattern seem to do better than those with DAD. Our data also imply that survival (of the acute episode) may be better than the literature suggests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".