Bibliographic record
Abstract
The science of therapeutic drug monitoring in children remains relatively underdeveloped. This is in part attributable to the continuing neglect of issues in pediatric pharmacology/toxicology and pharmacy during the past 50 years when the overall pace of change in other areas of therapeutics has been dramatic. For a variety of reasons, children have not participated in or received all the benefits of clinical progress in treatment and understanding of drug toxicity. In 1968, Dr. Harry Shirkey coined the phrase "therapeutic orphans" to describe the situation of infants, toddlers, and children who, in his view, were being denied access to modern drug therapy. Most authors have attributed this orphan status to the shortage of relevant drug research in children and to relative disinterest on the part of private sector sponsors, who generally have seen little potential for profit in the introduction of therapies targeting children. Exceptions to this pattern are found in drug categories such as anti-infectives, vitamins, respiratory drugs, seizure treatments, and analgesics. Additionally, there has been heavy emphasis placed on the study of drugs affecting behavior in conditions such as attention deficit disorder.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".