MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W203192988

[Early postoperative assessment of cognitive functions after stereotactic pallidotomy in patients with primary dystonia - preliminary results].

2007· article· en· W203192988 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julita Gryz, Adam Szołna, Marek Harat, Magdalena Olzak, Edward Jacek Gorzelańczyk

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPallidotomyWisconsin Card Sorting TestGlobus pallidusMedicineStroop effectExecutive functionsNeuropsychologyMontreal Cognitive AssessmentRating scaleTrail Making TestDystoniaCognitionBeck Depression InventoryNeuropsychological assessmentPhysical medicine and rehabilitationAudiologyPsychiatryPsychologyDeep brain stimulationBasal gangliaCognitive impairmentInternal medicineParkinson's diseaseDevelopmental psychologyAnxiety
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The newest studies notify that globus pallidus, besides the motor control, plays an important role in cognitive functioning of: memory, attention, linguistic skills, visuospatial ability, and executive functions. Stereotactic pallidotomy (the lesion of the motor region of the globus pallidus) is one of the surgery options that is used in the treatment of the primary dystonia. Motor region is located in the postero-ventral part of the internal globus pallidus. The goal of the study was to assess of the influence of pallidotomy on cognitive functioning in the group of patients suffering from the primary dystonia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen patients diagnosed with primary dystonia were treated by stereotactic pallidotomy and they were investigated neuropsychologically. The study was performed between March 2004 and February 2005. Neuropsychological assessment was conducted 1-2 days prior to operation and 2 days following the surgery. The clinical course of the cognitive functions and emotional status were assessed by the following neuropsychological tests: Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Trail Making Test A and B (TMT A and B), Stroop Color-Word Interference Test, N-back Test, Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), Benton Visual Retention Test (BVRT), Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). RESULTS: The statistically significant differences have been obtained between the results before and after the surgery in the depression scales: BDI (p<0.02) and in MADRS (p<0.01). None of the neuropsychological tests revealed significant differences between the results before and after the surgery. The only trend (p=0.06-0.07) was noted between results of AVLT before and after the surgery. The average results were worse after the surgery in the first, fifth and sixth attempt of the reply. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic pallidotomy has not significantly changed cognitive functions in the patients suffering from primary dystonia. Whereas, the emotional state has significantly improved in consequence of the applying surgery. Stereotactic pallidotomy in primary dystonia seems to be a treatment option safe for the patients' cognitive functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→French-language works237,207→