Clinical Study on Dahuang Lingxian Decoction against Postoperative
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To observe the clinical effect of Dahuang Lingxian Decoction in preventing postoperative recurrence ofcholelithiasis. Methods: 105 patients of cholelithiasis were randomly divided into 3 groups, receiving clinical treatmentand 12 months observation. Respectively, 36 cases in the group of Dahuang Lingxian Decoction were treated withmodified Dahuang Lingxian Decoction. 33 cases in blank group did not take any medicine of relieving gallbladder anddischarging stone except the routine therapy in preoperational period; 36 cases in Xiaoyan Lidan group administeredtablets of Xiaoyan Lidan. Results: After 3 treatment courses, it showed a total effective rate of 97.22% in DahuangLingxian Decoction group, 81.8% in blank group, and 83.3% in Xiaoyan Lidan group. Analyzed by statistics, thecurative effects between 3 groups had obvious differences (P is less than 0.05), and Dahuang Lingxian Decoction group wassignificantly superior to blank group and Xiaoyan Lidan group(P is less than 0.05). Conclusions: Dahuang Lingxian Decoction hadpreferable efficacy on Cholelithiasis and it is worthy of further promotion in clinical application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".