OS DESAFIOS DA EDUCAÇÃƑO DOMICILIAR NO BRASIL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The internal and external evaluations related to Brazilian education point to alarming and worrisome when it comes to developing skills reading, writing or math students, which grows in Brazil, mostly underground, the type of education called Home Education. For legal scholars, such secrecy only occurs because the constitution of Brazil was made in a time when there was a need for such discussion, and that after 20 years, today, many other demands on society. Adopted in several countries such as Canada, England, Mexico, Germany and some states of the United States of America brings about more than 2 million children around the world. The results indicate that practice in favour of its adherents than the cognitive aspect, the fact that these children to integrate easily into a variety of social backgrounds and are accustomed to take responsibility within their families what they motivate themselves in their day the day. Children benefited from the freedom to develop their skills at their own pace through a flexible approach, as well as receiving a high level of parental attention. The input of parents and commitment, regardless of their socioeconomic status and educational level, may be the most important factor in child development and its progress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".