Reduced hemoglobin on day of peripheral blood progenitor cell collection is associated with low graft content of vascular progenitors and increased toxicity after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tissue damage after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) occurs as a result of high-dose chemotherapy and radiation. The aim was to determine the importance of pretransplant anemia on toxicity and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements after autologous HSCT. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 350 patients undergoing autologous HSCT were included in the analysis. Patient factors and pretransplant laboratory values of possible relevance were assessed in multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Reduced hemoglobin (Hb) on the first day of peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection was significantly associated with increased organ toxicity after HSCT, as measured by the Seattle criteria. Lower Hb levels at baseline before transplantation, but not at PBPC collection, were significantly associated with increased RBC transfusion requirements. In a second cohort of 28 patients, higher Hb levels on the day of PBPC collection were significantly associated with increased levels of endothelial-like vascular progenitor cells in PBPC grafts. CONCLUSION: Our observations suggest that higher Hb levels on the day of PBPC collection may be a marker of reduced toxicity associated with HSCT and increased vascular progenitors in PBPC collections. Further, baseline anemia before transplant may reflect an unfavorable hematopoietic microenvironment that leads to increased RBC transfusion requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".