Micellization and Adsorption of a Series of Succinimide Dispersants
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The efficiency of a series of nonionic dispersants at stabilizing carbon-rich particles in oil was evaluated. The dispersants were synthesized by coupling a polyamine to two polyisobutylenes terminated at one end with a succinic anhydride (PIBSA). Their chemical composition was characterized by FTIR absorption. The associative strength of the dispersants was determined from their ability to self-associate in solution into reverse micelles. Their critical micelle concentration (CMC) and aggregation number (Nagg) were determined by fluorescence in an apolar solvent, namely hexane. The associative strength of the dispersants was found to increase with increasing number of secondary amines in the polyamine core. The adsorption isotherms describing the adsorption of the dispersants onto carbon black particles were determined and showed the existence of two binding regimes for the dispersants having more amines in their polar core. Much stronger binding occurred at dispersant concentration lower than the CMC. The weaker binding observed at dispersant concentrations larger than the CMC is believed to result from the dispersants having to compete between micellization and adsorption at concentrations above the CMC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it