MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032172272 · doi:10.2118/114517-ms

The Catalytic Effects of Nonhydrocarbon Contaminants on Equilibrium Water Vapor Content for a Dry Gas at HP/HT Reservoir Conditions

2008· article· en· W2032172272 on OpenAlexaff
J. A. Rushing, K. E. Newsham, K. C. Van Fraassen, S. A. Mehta, G. R. Wayne Moore

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryApache (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVaporizationWater vaporChemistryDry gasIsothermal processNatural gasSolubilityVapor pressureCO2 contentVapour pressure of waterWater contentEnvironmental chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ThermodynamicsCarbon dioxideChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents new laboratory data quantifying the catalytic effects of two common nonhydrocarbon contaminants (i.e., CO2 and N2) on the liquid water vaporization process as well as the water vapor content for natural gases at high-pressure, high-temperature (HP/HT) reservoir conditions. We conducted laboratory studies to measure the isothermal, equilibrium water vapor content for seven dry gas mixtures at pressures from 500 to 20,000 psia and temperatures of 300°F and 400°F. Gas mixtures evaluated in our study contained up to 20 mol% of either CO2 or N2 each. Principle results of our laboratory study demonstrate the following phase behavior: temperature has a significant impact on the water vaporization process and the quantity of water vapor dissolved in a natural gas with no nonhydrocarbon contaminants. Increasing the temperature from 300°F to 400°F increases the equilibrium water vapor content by more than 70% above that for the gas at 300°F; the presence of CO2 in the gas phase also enhances the solubility of water vapor in a natural gas. Increasing the CO2 content from 5 mol% to 20 mol% increases the maximum water vapor content by 20% to 40%, respectively, above that measured for the same gas with no CO2 These increases were observed at both 300°F and 400°F; the presence of CO2 in the gas phase combined with higher temperatures further augments water vapor solubility in a natural gas. For example, the equilibrium water vapor content for the gas with 20 mol% CO2 at 400°F increased by 80% above that measured for the same gas at 300°F; the presence of N2 in the gas phase suppresses the water vaporization process and reduces the quantity of water vapor dissolved in the gas. At 300°F, 5 mol% N2 reduces the water vapor content from 10% to 20% of that for the same gas with no N2. Further increases in N2 content reduce the water vapor content below that for the same gas with no N2; the enhanced water vapor solubility at higher temperatures counters the suppressive effects of N2 in the gas phase. Increasing the N2 content at 400°F increases the maximum water vapor content from 5% (20 mol% N2) to 10% (5 mol% N2) above that measured for the same gas with no N2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207