Role of angiotensin II type 1 receptors in the subfornical organ in the pressor responses to central sodium in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Central infusion of Na(+)-rich artificial cerebro-spinal fluid (aCSF) activates the brain renin-angiotensin system and causes sympatho-excitatory and pressor responses. We evaluated the role of the subfornical organ (SFO) and angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptors in the SFO in mediating the central Na(+)-induced pressor response. In conscious Wistar rats, intra SFO infusions of Na(+)-rich aCSF containing 0.45 and 0.6M Na(+) at 10 nl/min or injection of angiotensin II (Ang II) at 80 ng increased blood pressure (BP) by 15-22 mmHg, whereas mannitol with the same osmolarity as the Na(+)-rich aCSF had no effects. Intra SFO infusion of the AT1 receptor blocker candesartan abolished the pressor response induced by intra SFO administration of Na(+)-rich aCSF or Ang II. Intra cerebro-ventricular (icv) infusion of Na(+)-rich aCSF (0.3M Na(+)) at 3.8 μl/min for 10 min increased BP by 15-20 mmHg. Electrolytic lesion of the SFO attenuated these BP increases by 50-70%. Intra SFO infusion of candesartan also prevented 50% of these pressor responses. These data suggest that SFO neurons are indeed sensitive to Na(+), the SFO is a major - but not only - site in the brain to sense an increase in CSF [Na(+)], and activation of AT1 receptors in the SFO mediates the SFO component of the Na(+)-induced pressor response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".