MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032243612 · doi:10.1144/sp291.5

Distribution and chronology of submarine volcanic rocks around Santorini and their relationship to faulting

2007· article· en· W2032243612 on OpenAlexaff
David J. W. Piper, Georgia Pe‐Piper, C. Perissoratis, George Anastasakis

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityBedford Institute of OceanographyGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChronologyGeologySubmarineVolcanoVolcanic rockSubmarine volcanoPaleontologyGeochemistrySeismologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Seismic reflection profiles from the marine areas around Santorini in the south Aegean arc show the distribution of active faults and the occurrence of submarine volcanic rocks interfingering with stratified basinal sediment. Santorini is located at the intersection of fault sets of different ages. To the west, active faults trend east–west, whereas to the east, active faults trend ENE–WSW and a slightly older set of faults trends NE–SW. Subsurface submarine volcanic rocks can be dated using ages estimated for the stratified basin sediments elsewhere in the Milos–Christiani Basin. Volcanic horizons off Santorini correlate with the main (young) Akrotiri (0.65–0.55 Ma) and old Akrotiri (1.6 ka) volcanic episodes, respectively. Off Christiani, the upper unit of volcanic rocks is of similar age to the young Akrotiri episode and the lower volcanic unit is likely to be of latest Pliocene age. Late Neogene basin subsidence and volcanism are a consequence of changing patterns of faulting resulting from the collision of the African and Aegean–Anatolian plates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207