MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032244603 · doi:10.1093/ps/86.8.1633

Molting in Salmonella Enteritidis-Challenged Laying Hens Fed Alfalfa Crumbles. I. Salmonella Enteritidis Colonization and Virulence Gene hilA Response

2007· article· en· W2032244603 on OpenAlexfundno aff
K.D. Dunkley, J.L. McReynolds, Michael E. Hume, Claudia Dunkley, Todd R. Callaway, L.F. Kubena, D. J. Nisbet, Steven C. Ricke

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHatchU.S. Poultry and Egg Association
KeywordsSalmonella enteritidisSalmonellaBiologyMicrobiologyColonizationFecesSalmonella entericaVirulenceVeterinary medicineBacteriaMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objectives of this study were to enumerate Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis colonization in fecal, cecal, and internal organs, and to compare the level of virulence gene expression (hilA) of experimentally challenged laying hens fed different dietary molt-induction regimens. Twelve Salmonella-free Single Comb Leghorn hens (>50 wk old) hens were randomly assigned to each of 6 treatment groups designated based on diet in 2 trials: 1) feed withdrawal Salmonella Enteritidis-positive (FW+), 2) fully fed Salmonella Enteritidis-positive (FF+), 3) 100% alfalfa crumble Salmonella Enteritidis-positive (ALC+), 4) feed withdrawal Salmonella Enteritidis-negative, 5) fully fed Salmonella Enteritidis-negative, and 6) 100% alfalfa crumble Salmonella Enteritidis-negative. A forced molt was induced by a 12-d alfalfa diet and a feed-withdrawal regimen. On d 4 of the molt, all hens in groups 1, 2, and 3 were challenged by crop gavage with 1 mL of inocula containing approximately 10(6) cfu of nalidixic acid- and novobiocin-resistant Salmonella Enteritidis (phage type 13A). At the conclusion of both trials, all hens were euthanized and Salmonella Enteritidis colonization was enumerated in the cecal contents, liver, spleen, and ovaries. In addition, fecal (d 4 and 8) and cecal samples (necropsy at d 12) were collected postchallenge from treatment groups 1, 2, and 3 (Salmonella Enteritidis-positive) to quantify hilA expression by PCR. In both trials, all nonchallenged birds were Salmonella Enteritidis-negative; therefore, no further analysis was done. In trial 1, a 2-fold reduction in Salmonella Enteritidis colonization was observed in the ALC+ hens (log10 Salmonella Enteritidis of 1.99) compared with the FW+ hens (log(10) Salmonella Enteritidis of 3.89). In trial 2, a 4-fold reduction in Salmonella Enteritidis colonization was observed in the ALC+ hens (log(10) Salmonella Enteritidis of 1.27) compared with the FW+ hens (log(10) Salmonella Enteritidis of 5.12). In trial 2, Salmonella Enteritidis colonization in spleens was higher (P <or= 0.05) in FW+ hens compared with ALC+ and FF+ hens. Relative expression of hilA was higher (P <or= 0.05) in FW+ compared with FF+ hens, whereas the FF+ and ALC+ groups were not different (P > 0.05). In trial 2, hilA expression in FW+ hens was higher (P <or= 0.05) for d 6, 11, and 12, respectively, when compared with ALC+ and FF+ hens. The results of these studies support the concept that changes in the gastrointestinal tract microenvironment, such as those created during feed deprivation, encourage Salmonella Enteritidis virulence and susceptibility in molted hens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyFrench-language works237,207