MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032315259 · doi:10.1021/jf049364r

Ester Variability in Apple Varieties As Determined by Solid-Phase Microextraction and Gas Chromatography−Mass Spectrometry

2004· article· en· W2032315259 on OpenAlexaff
J. Christopher Young, C.L. Chu, Xuewen Lu, Honghui Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolid-phase microextractionMass spectrometryChromatographyGas chromatography–mass spectrometryChemistryGas chromatographyGas phaseOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with a polydimethylsiloxane fiber coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was applied to the study of variability in volatiles released by 13 apple varieties. The relative amounts of 40 esters and alpha-farnesene were determined. Principal component analyses of these results clustered the apples into three groups according to skin color: red, green, and red-green. Total ester contents were highest with the red cluster apples, and the green cluster apples had the highest alpha-farnesene levels. This technology was also applied to the monitoring of changes in volatiles for apples removed from controlled-atmosphere storage with subsequent storage at 4 degrees C and room temperature. Total ester contents increased 25-fold, with the greater increases coming at room temperature, whereas alpha-farnesene levels increased only 5-fold. For apples stored at room temperature, after 11 days, the amount of increase was inversely proportional to the size of the ester: levels of smallest esters (molecular weight 116) increased 12.5-fold, and the largest esters (molecular weight 228) increased approximately 1.3-fold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistrySame topicPesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyFrench-language works237,207