MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032318551 · doi:10.1159/000244181

Profile of Alveolar Gases during Periodic and Regular Breathing in Preterm Infants

2009· article· en· W2032318551 on OpenAlexaff
Manuel R. Pereira, Francisco C. Reis, Leanne V. Landriault, Donald B. Cates, Henrique Rigatto

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of the Neonate · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineMedicineAnimal scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To determine the changes in alveolar PCO<sub>2</sub> (P<sub>A</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>) and PO<sub>2</sub> (P<sub>A</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) during periodic and regular breathing epochs in the same infants, we studied 11 preterm infants during quiet sleep (birth weight 1,630 ± 94 g; gestational age 31 ± 1 weeks; postnatal age 32 ± 3 days). A total of 94 breathing/apneic cycles were analyzed and compared with regular periods. During periodic and regular breathing epochs, there were negative correlations of P<sub>A</sub>O<sub>2</sub> on P<sub>A</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>. Short (5 s) and long ( > 5 s) apneas for individual infants occurred along the regression line for that infant. There was not a single overall critical P<sub>A</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> below which apnea occurred, but for individual infants the P<sub>A</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> and the P<sub>A</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> of the breath preceding apnea varied within a limited range. Apneas occurred in clusters of P<sub>A</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> and P<sub>A</sub>O<sub>2</sub> along the average regression line of P<sub>A</sub>O<sub>2</sub> on P<sub>A</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>. Analysis of the data showed that apnea occurred at the lowest P<sub>A</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> and highest P<sub>A</sub>O<sub>2</sub> levels if allowance was made for circulation time. During apnea, ‘the best fit’ for the increase in P<sub>A</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> and the decrease in P<sub>A</sub>O<sub>2</sub> was linear, rather than logarithmic. The findings suggest the following. (1) There is not a single overall critical level of P<sub>A</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> for apnea to occur, but in a given infant this level varies within a limited range. This indicates that these infants are likely breathing near the apnea threshold. (2) Short and long apneas appear to occur randomly along the regression of P<sub>A</sub>O<sub>2</sub> on P<sub>A</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> for a particular infant. (3) The changes in alveolar gases are linear during apnea. The data are consistent with the idea that each infant has an optimum narrow range of P<sub>A</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> and P<sub>A</sub>O<sub>2</sub> values in which apnea occurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of the NeonateSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207