Identification of plasma antifibrin/fibrinogen antibodies in a patient with hemolytic uremic syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated a patient with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome without diarrhea to determine the presence of antibodies and the specificity of the related antigens. The patient experienced repeated episodes of hemolytic uremic syndrome. She is dialysis dependent. von Willebrand factor (vWF), vWF multimers, platelet aggregation, ADAMTS-13 activity and platelet immunoblots were determined. During acute episodes vWF increased threefold, with unusually large vWF multimers on two occasions. Platelet aggregation was normal but the plasma caused spontaneous aggregation of normal platelets. Reactivity was removed after absorption with protein A. Protein blotting against platelet and microvascular endothelial cells showed strong and persistent reactivity against antigens of 200 and 55 kDa. Two-dimensional immunoblots of the whole platelet proteome and incubation with plasma identified strong immunoreactivity with two target spots in the 55-kDa area. Mass spectroscopy confirmed the target as beta-fibrin, molecular weight 50.73 kDa, isoelectric point 7.95, with MASCOT scores of 859 and 750, Two years after presentation another band was detected at 66 kDa and identified as the alpha subunit of fibrin. This patient's plasma contained a platelet-aggregating factor that was removed by immunoglobulin absorption. She developed antibodies against the alpha and beta subunits of fibrin/fibrinogen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".