Development of Hsp25 expression compartments is not constrained by Purkinje cell defects in the Lurcher mouse mutant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four transverse zones can be distinguished in the adult mouse cerebellar cortex based on differential expression of cell-specific antigens, termination patterns of mossy fiber afferents, and phenotypes of mouse mutants with cerebellar defects: the anterior zone (AZ), central zone (CZ), posterior zone (PZ), and nodular zone (NZ). In the heterozygous Lurcher (Lc/+) mouse a zonally restricted abnormality in Purkinje cell development is seen. The Purkinje cell-specific antigen zebrin II is normally differentially expressed in all four zones of the adult cerebellum, but in the Lc/+ mutant is confined to the PZ and NZ, caudal to a transverse boundary in the dorsal aspect of lobule VIII. In this study we wanted to understand why zebrin II expression is arrested at this boundary and whether the Lc mutation affects the differentiation of additional Purkinje cell antigens in a similar manner. To determine this, we took advantage of the dynamic developmental timetable of another Purkinje cell antigen, the small heat shock protein Hsp25. Using immunohistochemistry we demonstrate that cerebellar maturation anterior to the CZ/PZ transverse boundary appears to be unaffected by the Lc allele, in that initial progression of Hsp25 expression in the Lc/+ cerebellum was similar to controls. Double-labeling experiments with anti-Hsp25 and anti-calbindin suggest that characteristic banding patterns of Hsp25 in Lc/+ cerebellum develop and are preserved despite cell loss. Thus, since simple temporal or spatial models cannot account for the zonal restriction seen during Lc/+ cerebellar development, the abnormality may be zebrin II-specific.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".