Repeated Passage of Wild-Type Woodchuck Hepatitis Virus in Lymphoid Cells Does Not Generate Cell Type-Specific Variants or Alter Virus Infectivity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Woodchuck hepatitis virus (WHV), which is closely related to human hepatitis B virus, infects the liver but also invariably establishes persistent infection in the lymphatic system. Although the dose of invading virus appears to be the main factor in determining whether WHV infection is restricted to the lymphatic system or also engages the liver, the nature of WHV lymphotropism remains unclear and a role for a specific lymphotropic variant was not excluded. The availability of woodchuck lymphocyte and hepatocyte cultures susceptible to WHV infection allows investigation of this issue in vitro. We hypothesized that repeated passage of wild-type WHV in lymphoid cells should lead to enrichment of a lymphotropic virus variant, if in fact such a variant exists. For this purpose, wild-type WHV with a homogeneous sequence was used as the inoculum, while lymphoid cells from a single healthy woodchuck donor and a normal woodchuck WCM-260 hepatocyte line served as infection targets. The serial passage of the wild-type virus repeated up to 13 times for both cell types did not lead to the emergence of cell type-specific WHV variants, as revealed by sequence analysis of the virus envelope and the core and X gene sequences. Moreover, the virus passaged in both cell types remained infectious for naive woodchucks, produced infection profiles that depended upon virus dose but not on virus cellular origin, and retained its initial DNA sequence. These results imply that WHV lymphotropism is a natural propensity of the wild-type virus and is not a consequence of infection with a viral variant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".