Immediate constraint-induced movement therapy causes local hyperthermia that exacerbates cerebral cortical injury in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT), which involves restraint of the nonimpaired arm coupled with physiotherapy for the impaired arm, lessens impairment and disability in stroke patients. Surprisingly, immediate ipsilateral forelimb immobilization exacerbates brain injury in rats. We tested whether immediate ipsilateral restraint for 7 days aggravates injury after a devascularization lesion in rats. Furthermore, we hypothesized that ipsilateral restraint aggravates injury by causing hyperthermia. In experiment 1, each rat received two lesions, one in the motor cortex and one in the visual cortex. Ipsilateral restraint increased only the motor cortex lesion. In additional rats, no differences in core temperature occurred after ipsilateral or contralateral restraint. Thus, ipsilateral restraint does not aggravate injury by a systemic side effect. In experiment 2, we hypothesized that ipsilateral restraint causes hyperthermia in the region surrounding the initial cortical lesion. Brain temperature, measured via telemetry, was significantly higher (approximately 1 degrees C for 24 h) with ipsilateral restraint. A third experiment similarly found that ipsilateral restraint aggravates injury and causes local cortical hyperthermia and that contralateral restraint with externally induced mild hyperthermia aggravates injury. In conclusion, immediate ipsilateral restraint aggravates injury apparently by localized events that include hyperthermia. Caution must be exercised in applying early CIMT to humans, as hyperthermia is detrimental.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".