MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032491068 · doi:10.1121/1.4788447

ArtiSynth designing a modular 3D articulatory speech synthesizer

2005· article· en· W2032491068 on OpenAlexaffabout
Florian Vogt, Oliver Guenther, Allan Hannam, Kees van den Doel, John E. Lloyd, Leah Vilhan, Rahul Chander, Justin Lam, Charles Wilson, Kalev Tait, Donald Derrick, Ian Wilson, Carol P. Jaeger, Bryan Gick, Eric Vatikiotis‐Bateson, Sidney Fels

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceModular designComponent (thermodynamics)Vocal tractInterface (matter)Rendering (computer graphics)Scripting languageSpeech synthesisParametric statisticsParametric modelSpeech recognitionComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ArtiSynth is a modular, component-based system for performing dynamic 3D simulations of the human vocal tract and face. It provides a test bed for research in areas such as speech synthesis, linguistics, medicine, and dentistry. ArtiSynths framework enables researchers to construct, refine, and exchange models of all parts of the vocal tract and surrounding structures. ArtiSynth introduces a probe concept to unify input and output data flow, which allows control of and access to models with time varying data series. ArtiSynth supports interconnected heterogeneous models, such as rigid body, mass-spring, and parametric, using a point-set connection method, called markers, for constraint satisfaction. Using ArtiSynth, we created a muscle-driven rigid body jaw model, a parametric principle component tongue model from MRI images, a parametric lip model, and mass-spring face tissue model. We combined them in various ways. Data from medical imaging (MRI, CT, and ultrasound) and other technologies such as optical tracking can be used to drive ArtiSynth models. We are currently developing an acoustical rendering framework supporting source-filter models and other advanced methods. The system incorporates a powerful scripting interface as well as an easy-to-use graphical interface. [Work supported by NSERC Canada and ATR Japan.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicSpeech Recognition and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207