MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Peroxide-initiated comonomer grafting of styrene and maleic anhydride onto polyethylene: Effect of polyethylene microstructure

2000· article· en· W2032497519 on OpenAlexaff
David C. Clark, W. E. Baker, Ralph A. Whitney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer crystallization and properties
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComonomerDegree of unsaturationStyrenePolymer chemistryMaleic anhydridePeroxidePolyethyleneBranching (polymer chemistry)Materials scienceGraftingChemistryCopolymerOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maleic anhydride has been grafted onto various polyethylenes (PEs) using 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-(di-t-butylperoxy)hexane as a free radical initiator in the presence of styrene as a comonomer. Three polyethylenes, differing systematically in their levels of terminal unsaturation and branching, were selected to investigate the effect of these microstructural characteristics on the course of both grafting and crosslinking. It was observed that when polyethylenes containing high levels of terminal unsaturation were reacted in the presence of peroxide or peroxide–maleic anhydride, crosslinking events were enhanced. When styrene was added as comonomer to the reaction medium to eliminate these undesirable side reactions, crosslinking was still observed with those polyethylenes that contained a high concentration of terminal unsaturation. This is attributed to a low reactivity between styrene and the allylic radical generated on the polyethylene backbone, which is believed to be responsible for the increased crosslinking. However, in the presence of high concentrations of styrene, crosslinking was eliminated for PEs containing high degrees of branching. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 96–107, 2001

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicPolymer crystallization and propertiesFrench-language works237,207