MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032498089 · doi:10.1097/pec.0b013e31818844cf

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Two Fluid Regimens in the Initial Management of Septic Shock in the Emergency Department

2008· article· en· W2032498089 on OpenAlexaff
Indumathy Santhanam, Shanthi Sangareddi, Shekhar T. Venkataraman, Niranjan Kissoon, Vaidehi Thiruvengadamudayan, R. Kulandhai Kasthuri

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Emergency Care · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSeptic shockOdds ratioEmergency departmentConfidence intervalProspective cohort studyIntubationRandomized controlled trialResuscitationAnesthesiaInternal medicineSepsis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To compare the impact of 40 mL/kg of fluid over 15 minutes followed by dopamine and further titration of therapy to achieve therapeutic goals (study protocol) versus 20 mL/kg over 20 minutes up to a maximum of 60 mL/kg over 1 hour followed by dopamine (control protocol) in septic shock. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective randomized controlled study in the emergency department of a public hospital in India. PATIENTS: One hundred forty-seven children older than 1 month presenting with septic shock were enrolled into the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital mortality (primary outcome), 72-hour survival, achievement of therapeutic goals of shock resolution, incidence of hypoxia, hepatomegaly, intubation at 20, 40, and 60 minutes (secondary outcomes) were compared between the arms. RESULTS: Seventy-four and 73 children were assigned to the study and control group, respectively. Overall mortality was 17.6%, 26 deaths with 13 in each arm. Mortality in the study cohort was lower than our historical mortality of 50% (P<0.0001), 95% confidence interval (CI), 11.9-24.8. Cumulative survival at 72 hours was 72.5% (95% CI, 58.9-86.1) and 77.6% (95% CI, 66.0%-89.2%) in the control and study groups, respectively. Resolution of shock in the emergency department was associated with survival odds ratio (OR) 9.2 (95% CI, 2.1-40.8). Rapidity of achieving therapeutic goals was not significantly different between groups. Intubation rates were also the same (46.5% in the control group versus 55% in the study group; P=0.28). At 20 minutes, 35.6% of the control group and 70% of the study group had hepatomegaly (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the overall mortality, rapidity of shock resolution, or incidence of complications between the groups. The occurrence of hepatomegaly at 20 minutes following 40 mL/kg is of concern in settings with limited access to post-resuscitation ventilator care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations103
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Emergency CareSame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207