MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032546718 · doi:10.1501/jms_0000000007

PERINATAL LETHAL FORM OF HYPOPHOSPHATASIA

2005· article· en· W2032546718 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Begüm Atasay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ankara Medical School · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlkaline Phosphatase Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypophosphatasiaMedicinePediatricsAlkaline phosphataseChemistryBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypophosphatasia is a rare and lethal metabolic bone disease characterised by low or absent serum and tissue-alkaline phosphatase activities resulting in insufficient bone mineralisation. Hypophosphatasia has been reported throughout the world and affects all races; however, it is especially prevalent in Manitoba, Canada, where about one in 25 individuals is a carrier and 1: 2.500 newborns manifest severe disease. Six forms of hypophosphatasia have been identified. The perinatal (lethal), infantile, childhood and adult types are distinguished from one another by the age at which clinical manifestations and bone lesions are recognised. Patients with dental manifestations but no skeletal disease are considered to have odontohypophosphatasia. Pseudohypophosphatasia is a rare variant of hypophosphatasia characterised by normal serum alkalinephosphatase (ALP) activity (1). The severe infantile form of hypophosphatasia is autosomal-recessively inherited and is lethal in the neonatal period (2). We report a neonate with congenital hypophosphatasia in which prenatal diagnosis could not be carried out, in spite of the termination of the mother’s former pregnancy because of abnormal skeletal development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Ankara Medical SchoolSame topicAlkaline Phosphatase Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207