MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032697794 · doi:10.1086/309364

A New View of Cold H<scp>i</scp>Clouds in the Milky Way

2000· article· en· W2032697794 on OpenAlexaffabout
S. J. Gibson, A. R. Taylor, L. A. Higgs, P. E. Dewdney

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsDominion Astrophysical ObservatoryUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMilky WayAstrophysicsGalactic planePopulationMolecular cloudLine (geometry)AstronomyGalaxyStarsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We reveal cold Galactic clouds of neutral hydrogen in unprecedented detail. Our 21 cm synthesis maps, taken from the Canadian Galactic Plane Survey, show a numerous and diverse population of H I self-absorption (HISA) features in gas outside the solar circle. These objects vary in size, shape, and contrast against the background H I. All display a high level of angular and velocity structure, and most would appear significantly diluted, if not invisible, in lower resolution H I surveys. A number of Perseus arm features remain unresolved by the 1' beam of our survey, with apparent diameters less than 0.6 pc at 2 kpc distance. The majority of HISA features we detect have no obvious 12CO emission counterparts. This suggests that either HISA is not found predominantly in molecular clouds, as has often been presumed in the past, or that CO is not a good tracer of H2. Some HISA lacking CO shows far-infrared dust emission, though whether this arises from shielded molecular gas or from diffuse atomic clouds is not clear. Constraining the gas properties of HISA remains a difficult problem, but we introduce a new method that aids this process. Our approach relates a number of physical parameters via gas law and line integral relationships and should prove powerful if the input variables are sufficiently well known. We explore the current allowed parameter ranges for three sample features of very different appearance. We find spin temperatures ≲50 K and densities ≳102 cm-3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations130
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207