Radioactive iodine therapy for malignant and benign thyroid disease: a Canadian national survey of physician practice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radioactive iodine (as Na131I) has been used in the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid disease for more than 60 years, but the various treatment centres in Canada have different practice patterns. AIM: To determine whether there is a definable, nationwide pattern of practice which may be used to elucidate standards of practice and clarify some issues that arise when multiple care-givers are involved. METHODS: A survey questionnaire was mailed to all sites licensed by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission to administer Na131I for benign and malignant thyroid therapy. A second mailing was sent to non-responders. The questionnaire addressed the involvement of personnel: i.e., who prescribes, determines doses, obtains informed consent, counsels on radiation safety, administers the therapy, and follows the patient post-therapy. The survey also specifically addressed whether a nuclear medicine physician reviewed laboratory work or met with patients pre-therapy. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 60% (74/123) with representation from all Canadian provinces. The majority of respondents were physicians (78%). The data include 3447 benign thyroid therapies and 1202 malignant thyroid therapies. There are no significant regional differences in the average maximum dose administered for either benign or malignant thyroid therapies. The majority of therapies are administered in community and academic hospital settings. Endocrinologists most commonly prescribe Na131I for malignant thyroid therapies and nuclear medicine physicians for benign thyroid therapies. For all therapies nuclear medicine physicians most commonly obtain informed consent, determine the dose and provide radiation safety counselling. Nuclear medicine technologists most commonly administer the therapy and endocrinologists most commonly provide post-therapy follow-up. In the majority of centres, nuclear medicine physicians review the laboratory results for each patient's blood sample and meet with patients before therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple health care specialists take part in Na131I therapy for both benign and malignant thyroid disease. In most centres, nuclear medicine physicians have major roles in the delivery of the treatments, including reviewing clinical and biochemical information. The findings of this study should provide reassurance to many centres and guidance to others to allow closer harmonization of practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".