Nonlinear time-dependent density-functional-theory study of ionization and harmonic generation in CO<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>by ultrashort intense laser pulses: Orientational effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Time-dependent density-functional-theory (TDDFT) methods are used to calculate the orientational dependence of ionization and molecular high-order harmonic generation (MHOHG) in the CO${}_{2}$ molecule as a function of laser intensity ${I}_{0}\ensuremath{\geqslant}{10}^{14}$ W$/$cm${}^{2}$ for few-cycle 800 nm laser pulses. A time-series analysis is used to confirm the recollision model in MHOHG for different density potentials. It is found that at intensities ${I}_{0}>3.5\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{14}$ W$/$cm${}^{2}$, lower highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMO's) contribute significantly to ionization and to the MHOHG process. This is due to the symmetry of these orbitals. Even though such lower orbitals have higher ionization potentials (IP), ionization and MHOHG processes occur when orbital densities are maximum with laser polarization direction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.077 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".