Experimental and Numerical Study of Laminar Round Jet Flows Along a Wall
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study, both experimental and numerical techniques were employed to study three-dimensional laminar wall jet flows. The wall jet was created using a circular pipe of diameter 7×10−3 m and flows into an open water tank. The inlet Reynolds numbers based on the pipe diameter and jet exit velocity were 310 and 800. A particle image velocimetry (PIV) was used to conduct detailed measurements at various streamwise-transverse and streamwise-spanwise planes. The complete nonlinear incompressible Navier–Stokes equation was also solved using a collocated finite volume based in-house computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code. The computation was performed for three inlet Reynolds numbers, namely, 310, 420, and 800. From the PIV measurements and CFD results, velocity profiles and jet half-widths were extracted at selected downstream locations. It was observed that the numerical results are in reasonable agreement with the experimental data. The distributions of the velocities, jet spread rates, and vorticity were used to provide insight into the characteristics of three-dimensional laminar wall jet flows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".