Engineering Lipobeads: Properties of the Hydrogel Core and the Lipid Bilayer Shell
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We previously reported on a novel system termed Lipobead that consists of hydrogel beads encased within an anchored lipid bilayer. The hydrogel particles are formed by inverse suspension polymerization of dimethylacrylamide with N,N'-ethylenebis(acrylamide). During the polymerization stage, the water in oil emulsion is interfacially stabilized by small molecule surfactants as well as a small percentage of lipid functionalized with a vinyl group. The functionalized lipid becomes tethered to the bead surface and promotes the assembly of a lipid bilayer on the surface of the hydrogel beads. The presence of the functionalized lipid during polymerization dramatically alters the yield, average size, and size distribution of beads produced. This paper examines the effect of various chemical and physical processing parameters on the average size and size distribution of beads produced when lipid is a component of the surfactant mixture. Relationships between the processing parameters, average bead size, and size distribution were established. Macroscopic properties of the lipid bilayers of Lipobeads were also evaluated including phase transition temperature as well as permeability to the small polar molecule, adenosine triphosphate. It was established that the presence of functionalized lipid improves the organization of the bilayer on the Lipobead surface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".