Understanding the cultural context of Chinese mothers’ perceptions of breastfeeding and infant health in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore Chinese mothers' perceptions about breastfeeding and infant health in the Canadian context. BACKGROUND: Chinese mothers' breastfeeding perceptions are challenging for health professionals in North America, but few studies have focused on this issue in depth. DESIGN: An interpretive qualitative methodology was used. METHODS: Data were collected through semi-structured individual interviews with 15 purposively sampled Chinese mothers two months after delivery in Vancouver, British Columbia. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Constant comparative analysis was used to develop coding categories and identify themes. RESULTS: Two main themes emerged: (1) the idea of harmony within change and (2) the meaning of infant health. The first represents mothers' perceptions about breastfeeding: the value of common sense, purity of breast milk and the laws of nature. The second represents notions of infant health, including its indicators and the relationship between mother's health and infant health. CONCLUSIONS: Chinese mothers' concepts of breastfeeding are associated with Western biomedical thought, traditional Chinese medicine and personal experiences, especially those embedded in the traditional Chinese cultural context. Perceptions of breastfeeding and infant health regarding notions of harmony within natural dynamic patterns must be considered when promoting breastfeeding. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study highlights the cultural context affecting Chinese mothers' breastfeeding practices. Nurses and other health professionals require sensitivity when assessing Chinese mothers' breastfeeding practice so that they are able to provide appropriate postnatal and breastfeeding support.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".