MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Intracellular HSP72 Expression in Monocyte Subsets Between Trained and Untrained Individuals During Exertional Heat Stress

2006· article· en· W2032934795 on OpenAlexaff
Glen A. Selkirk, Tom M. McLellan, Heather E. Wright, Shawn G. Rhind, Ira Jacobs

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpaceflight effects on biology
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD14Hsp70Heat shockMedicineIntracellularHeat shock proteinMonocyteEndocrinologyInternal medicineVO2 maxPopulationAndrologyFlow cytometryImmunologyChemistryBlood pressureBiochemistryHeart rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monocytes are a heterogeneous population with two distinct subsets, regular (CD14Bright+) and proinflammatory (CD14Dim+). Little is known about the intracellular heat shock protein (HSP) 72 expression in these subsets during exertional heat stress. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of exertional heat stress on HSP72 expression in CD14+ monocyte subsets in trained and untrained individuals. METHODS: Maximum oxygen consumption expressed per kg of lean body mass (LBM) and activity history was used to divide subjects into trained (TR, n=8, VO2peak = 68 ± 2 mL·kgLBM−-min−1) and untrained (UT, n=6, VO2peak = 49 ± 1 mL·kgLBM−1-min−1) groups. Subjects walked at 4.5 km-h1 with 2% elevation in a climatic chamber (40°C; 30% R.H.) wearing military biological and chemical protective clothing until specific end-point criteria were attained. Venous blood samples were collected at baseline, rectal temperatures of 38.0°C, 38.5°C, 39.0°C and at exhaustion. Whole blood samples were analyzed immediately by flow cytometry for spontaneous intracellular HSP72 immunofluorecence staining in monocyte subsets CD14Dim+ and CD14Bright+. Similar analyses were performed at baseline and exhaustion following in vitro heat shock (42°C, 2 hr). RESULTS: Total CD14+ and CD14+Bright counts (×109cells/L) were significantly increased in TR at exhaustion compared to UT, whereas UT subjects levels of CD14+Dim were significantly increased compared to TR at 39.0°C and exhaustion (0.12 ± 0.04 vs. 0.076 ± 0.004 ×109cells). Percentages of CD14+ cells positive for intracellular HSP72 expression were significantly elevated in TR compared to UT during in vivo heat stress; however, following in-vitro heat shock (42°C, 2hr), only CD14Dim+ subset was significantly elevated compared to UT. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal an increased level of proinflammatory (CD14Dim+) monocytes in the circulation in UT versus TR during heat stress. Furthermore, UT had a blunted HSP response in their proinflammatory monocyte subset upon subsequent in-vitro heat shock. Combined, these findings imply a cytoprotective adaptation in highly trained individuals, which may help contribute to increased thermotolerance. Research was funded by a DRDC Technology Investment Fund.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicSpaceflight effects on biologyFrench-language works237,207