MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2032973674 · doi:10.5539/jfr.v2n2p1

Effectiveness of Dichrostachys glomerata Spice Phenolics in Reduction of Oxidative Stress Associated with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes; a Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

2013· article· en· W2032973674 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dieudonné Kuate, Anne Pascale Nouemsi Kengne, William Dakam, Blanche C. Etoundi, Ghislain Djiokeng Paka, Judith Laure Ngondi, Julius Enyong Oben

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicVitamin C and Antioxidants Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlaceboAntioxidantOxidative stressType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusInternal medicineGlutathioneMedicineEndocrinologyChemistryObesityPharmacologyBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work evaluated the effect of Dichrostachys glomerata on the improvement of antioxidant biomarkers in obesity and type 2 diabetes participants, in an eight-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design study. The active (400 mg) or placebo formulation were administered twice daily throughout the study period to two normoglycemic and two diabetic obese random groups. Plasma levels of a total of 8 biochemical parameters were taken at the baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. No differences in urate variation were observed while the plasma phenolic content as well as the reduced glutathione level, ascorbate concentration, FRAP value and enzymatic antioxidant activities significantly increased with a concomitant reduction of MDA after 8 weeks compared to placebo (P < 0.01). On the contrary to urate and ascorbate, plasma polyphenol content correlated well with FRAP level in both treated groups indicating that phenolics from the spice greatly contributed to the antioxidant activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Food ResearchSame topicVitamin C and Antioxidants ResearchFrench-language works237,207