MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033059027 · doi:10.2118/58761-ms

Fracture Geometry Optimization: Designs Utilizing New Polymer-Free Fracturing Fluid and Log-Derived Stress Profile / Rock Properties

2000· article· en· W2033059027 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brett Rimmer, Curtis MacFarlane, Chuck Mitchell, Henry Wolfs, Mathew Samuel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWirelineGeologyBoreholeDrillingOil shalePetroleum engineeringGeotechnical engineeringHydraulic fracturingPermeability (electromagnetism)Fracture (geology)Petroleum reservoirWell loggingClastic rockPetrologyGeomorphologyMaterials scienceStructural basinEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Newport Petroleum Co. embarked on an exploration and development drilling program in a channel sand. This clastic channel was situated within a much larger, fully developed field located in Central Alberta. The new wells were drilled for a target interval that that is known to have low reservoir permeability, and would have to be fracture stimulated to produce economically. The offset wells were all drilled and duly stimulated using a design based on historical knowledge. Following treatment, they produced at a rate that wascost effective; however, the rate was not as high as expected. In addition, post job pressure analysis of the treatments showed that the actual recorded job pressures could not be matched with the initial simulator predictions. The net pressure indicated uncontrolled fracture height growth. The fracture designs on the offset wells were made utilizing rock properties and a stress profile based on conventional open hole logs. These indicated a sandstone pay zone bounded below by a calcite cemented sand then shale and dirty sand / shale above. There were no signs of a weak zone that would have accounted for the height growth that was indicated from the actual job data. In order to have a better understanding of how the fracture was actually growing; it became apparent that an improved knowledge of the stress profile and rock properties from wireline logs (conventional open hole logs plus the dipole shear sonic imager) would be required. Using this information an optimized fracture design could be made on future wells. Coupled with the log derived stress profile, the new polymer-free, visco-elastic surfactant (VES) based fracturing fluid was also used to maximize conductivity and minimize height. This fluid has a much lower viscosity than conventional polymer fluids. Due to its polymer-free nature, VES fluids provide a great improvement in retained fracture conductivity. When using crosslinked polymer fluids, very high viscosity is required for proppant transport and in most cases; this high viscosity can result in uncontrollable fracture height growth. Proppant transport capability of a VES fluid is not viscosity related, but due to the network structure created by the worm-like micelles. When this fracturing fluid (with low viscosity) is utilized, the generation of the unnecessary height growth is reduced. The paper includes the case histories and overall processes that were used to optimize fracture designs with Dipole shear sonic imager derived stress profile / rock properties,Investigation for preventing fracture height growth, andUse of a visco-elastic surfactant based fracturing fluid. The result of this work was a 3–4 fold production increase for all of the subsequent wells. This success led to an expanded drilling program of approximately 25 wells. The result of this work was a 3-4 fold production increase for all of the subsequent wells. This success led to an expanded drilling program of approximately 25 wells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207