MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033069516 · doi:10.1021/nl072026v

Plasma within Templates:  Molding Flexible Nanocrystal Solids into Multifunctional Architectures

2007· article· en· W2033069516 on OpenAlexaff
Arya Ghadimi, Ludovico Cademartiri, Ulrich Kamp, Geoffrey A. Ozin

Bibliographic record

VenueNano Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanocrystalNanorodNanotechnologyTemplateMaterials scienceNanostructure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, there has been a great deal of progress in the synthesis of colloidal nanocrystals with tailored physical and chemical properties through control of size and shape, chemical composition, and surface functionalization (Alivisatos, A. P. Science 1996, 271 (5251), 933−937; Burda, C.; Chen, X. B.; Narayanan, R.; El-Sayed, M. A. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105 (4), 1025−1102). Nanocrystals are thus ideal building blocks for hierarchical self-assembly of topologically complex, multifunctional architectures with properties tuneable at each level of the hierarchy. Here, we present a method, which combines template-assisted self-assembly of nanocrystals with plasma polymerization (Cademartiri, L.; von Freymann, G.; Arsenault, A. C.; Bertolotti, J.; Wiersma, D. S.; Kitaev, V.; Ozin, G. A. Small 2005, 1 (12), 1184−1187) to realize hierarchical architectures that both retain the properties of the nanocrystals and offer multifunctionality. As examples, we describe CoFe 2 O 4 −PbS mixed nanocrystal nanorods, which photoluminesce, and align and move in unison with an applied magnetic field and PbS nanocrystal inverse opals, which emit and Bragg diffract near-infrared light. Such hierarchical nanocrystal architectures can be envisioned to spawn new nanotechnologies that integrate multiple functionalities into a single construct.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNano LettersSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207