MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033071716 · doi:10.1002/rmv.651

The distinguishing features of human metapneumovirus and respiratory syncytial virus

2010· review· en· W2033071716 on OpenAlexafffund
Jesse Papenburg, Guy Boivin

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in Medical Virology · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier de l'Université LavalUniversité Laval
FundersUniversité Laval
KeywordsHuman metapneumovirusBronchiolitisMetapneumovirusMedicinePneumoniaParamyxoviridaeVirologyImmunologyDiseaseRespiratory tract infectionsEpidemiologyVirusViral diseaseRespiratory systemPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Human Metapneumovirus (hMPV) is a member of the Metapneumovirus genus within the Pneumovirinae subfamily of the Paramyxoviridae family. Though hMPV was only discovered in 2001, a large body of work has already shown that it is the aetiologic agent of a substantial proportion of upper and lower RTIs across all age groups in both healthy and immunocompromised hosts throughout the world. RSV, also a pneumovirus, is the human pathogen most closely related to hMPV. RSV is the leading cause of pneumonia and bronchiolitis in infants and young children, but can also cause respiratory tract disease in all age groups. In this paper, we will review the salient features of the virology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, host immune responses, clinical manifestations and diagnostic modalities of hMPV, using RSV as a comparison. In addition, we will show how immunoprophylactic and therapeutic strategies studied and used in clinical practice for RSV-some with great success, and others tragic failure-have led to promising areas of research for the prevention and treatment of the significant burden of disease caused by hMPV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations95
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReviews in Medical VirologySame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207