MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quantification of microcystin-producing cyanobacteria and E. coli in water by 5'-nuclease PCR

2002· article· en· W2033094862 on OpenAlexafffund
Inge V. Foulds, A. Granacki, Chengbin Xiao, Ulrich J. Krull, Alan J. Castle, Paul A. Horgen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Microbiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoBrock UniversityAmgen (Canada)
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLibrary scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: 5'-Nuclease (real-time, quantitative) PCR methodologies were developed and applied as diagnostic tools for the detection of microcystin-producing cyanobacteria and Escherichia coli in water. METHODS AND RESULTS: PCR was used to detect regions of the lacZ gene in E. coli, and the microcystin synthetase gene in microcystin-producing cyanobacteria. In environmental water samples, natural inhibitors to PCR were effectively removed with a prefiltration step and an EDTA wash. A lower detection limit of 10 cells ml(-1) was obtained with endpoint PCR detection. 5'-Nuclease PCR was used for microbial quantification of 1 ml inoculated water samples. We were able to detect down to three copies of our target genes per sample within about 2 h (post-DNA isolation) for both E. coli and microcystin-producing cyanobacteria. CONCLUSIONS: 5'-Nuclease PCR offers a rapid and sensitive method of bacterial quantification in water samples. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: 5'-Nuclease PCR can be adopted as an effective diagnostic tool for monitoring microbiological water quality, through coliform quantification, and detection of other waterborne microbial pathogens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied MicrobiologySame topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsFrench-language works237,207