MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033226561 · doi:10.4236/jct.2013.47a003

Neurotensin Receptor 1 (NTSR1) Overexpression in Breast Carcinomas Is Common and Independent of ER/PR/Her2 Expression

2013· article· en· W2033226561 on OpenAlexafffund
Xianyong Gui, Shuhong Liu, Ziran Meng, Zu‐Hua Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cancer Therapy · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of Calgary
FundersCalgary Laboratory Services
KeywordsNeurotensinImmunohistochemistryProgesterone receptorCancer researchNeurotensin receptorBreast cancerReceptorInternal medicineDownregulation and upregulationMedicineCancerEstrogen receptorChemistryGeneNeuropeptideBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neurotensin (NT) is a 13-amino acid peptide with trophic effects on some neoplasms. Its bioactivities are mainly mediated by neurotensin receptor 1 (NTSR1). Both NT and NTSR1 were found to be upregulated in breast cancer. NT/NTSR1 thus becomes a potential therapeutic target. We studied whether any correlation exists between the expression of NTSR1 in breast carcinomas and the expression of ER, PR, and Her2. A total 85 cases of invasive ductal (62) and lobular (23) breast carcinomas were studied. Based on their ER/PR profiles, the ductal carcinomas (DCs) were subcategorized into ER+/PR+ (21), ER+/PR﹣ (20), and ER﹣/PR﹣ (21). All of the lobular carcinomas (LCs) were ER+/PR+. 21.57% of all DCs and 5.56% of LCs were Her2 positive. 77.78% of ER﹣/PR﹣ DCs were also Her2 negative (triple negative). The expression of NTSR1 was detected by immunohistochemistry and was semiquantitated (as negative, 1+, 2+, 3+). Both 2+ and 3+ were collectively defined as overexpression. The expression of NTSR1 was weak and focal in non-neoplastic mammary epithelial cells. It is increased in 74.19% of DCs (80.95% in ER+/PR+, 75% in ER+/PR﹣, and 66.67% in ER﹣/PR﹣ group), and in 95.65% of LCs. The overexpression of NTSR1 is similar between ER+ DCs and ER﹣ DCs (75% vs 66.67%, p > 0.05) as well as between PR+ DCs and PR﹣ DCs (80.95% in ER+/PR+ DCs vs 75% in ER+/PR﹣ DCs, p > 0.05). And it was seen in 77.78% of Her2+ DCs, 78.38% of Her2﹣ DCs, 94.12% of Her2﹣ LCs, and 78.57% of triple negative DCs. Overall, NTSR1 is commonly overexpressed in both ductal and lobular breast carcinomas and is independent of the ER/PR/Her2 profiles of the tumors. The present data supports the potential benefit of developing NTSR1 blockers in the adjuvant therapy of breast carcinomas, particularly for those “triple negative” tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cancer TherapySame topicNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207