Incidence of Spontaneous Closure of Outlet Ventricular Septal Defect.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study examined the Doppler echocardiograms of 742 patients with an outlet ventricular septal defect (VSD) who were seen at the National Cardiovascular Center from 1987 to 1999. Of these, 450 patients were followed for longer than 1 year; 161 of these 450 were younger than 12 months when first examined. During follow-up, Doppler echocardiographic examination was repeated at least once a year. The medical charts of these patients were reviewed. Doppler echocardiographic findings were analysed in patients whose defect closed spontaneously:spontaneous closure at the age of 1-25 years was identified in 17 (3.8%) of 450 patients who were followed for longer than 1 year, and 7 (4.3%) of the 161 patients who were younger than 12 months at the first examination. All closed VSDs were originally smaller than 4mm. Although 5 cases of 17 developed trivial deformity of the right coronary cusp, suggesting a prolapse, this did not progress. Of these 5, trivial aortic regurgitation (AR) was detected in one patient, while another patient in the group of 17 developed trivial AR without any deformity of the right coronary cusp. Aortic regurgitation was not progressive in either patient. An outlet VSD closes spontaneously in a small percentage of patients without developing progressive AR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".