MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033294916 · doi:10.1148/rg.235035031

US of Liver Transplants: Normal and Abnormal

2003· review· en· W2033294916 on OpenAlexaff
Jane Crossin, Derek Muradali, Stephanie R. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiographics · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLiver transplantationTransplantationInferior vena cavaRadiologyStenosisPortal vein thrombosisAnastomosisLiver diseaseAbnormalityThrombosisSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whole-liver transplantation is an accepted and successful method of treating end-stage liver disease. As a result of the shortage of cadaveric livers, split-liver transplantation and living donor liver transplantation are becoming more commonplace. Ultrasonography (US) is the initial imaging modality of choice for detection and follow-up of early and delayed complications from all types of liver transplantation. Vascular complications include thrombosis and stenosis of the hepatic artery, portal vein, or inferior vena cava, as well as hepatic artery pseudoaneurysms and celiac artery stenosis. Biliary complications include leaks, strictures, stones or sludge, dysfunction of the sphincter of Oddi, and recurrent disease. Neoplastic disease in the transplanted liver may represent recurrent neoplasia or posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder. Parenchymal disease may take the form of a focal mass or a diffuse parenchymal abnormality. Perihepatic fluid collections and ascites are common after liver transplantation. Knowledge of the surgical technique of liver transplantation and awareness of the normal US appearance of the transplanted liver permit early detection of complications and prevent misdiagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations231
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiographicsSame topicOrgan Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207