MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033382581 · doi:10.1117/12.870261

Kinetic analysis of singlet oxygen generation in a living cell using Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green

2010· article· en· W2033382581 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yi Shen, Huiyun Lin, Zufang Huang, Lifu Xiao, Defu Chen, Buhong Li, Shusen Xie

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsSinglet oxygenPhotosensitizerIntracellularProtoporphyrin IXFluorescenceChemistryPhotodynamic therapyPhotochemistryExtracellularBiophysicsMembraneOxygenBiochemistryBiologyOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Singlet oxygen (1O2) can be generated in a living cell upon focused laser irradiation of an intracellular photosensitizer. In this study, 1O2 generation from the plasma membrane-targeted protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma CNE2 cells was monitored indirectly by using the fluorescence probe Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green agent (SOSG). The confocal images indicate that the fluorescence of SOSG in the vicinity of the cells that incubated with PpIX was dramatically enhanced with the increased irradiation time, while there is no significant enhancement for the control cells. Moreover, the fluorescence of SOSG is dramatically enhanced with the increase of the intracellular PpIX in CNE2 cells for the same photoirradiation time. These observations imply that the 1O2 generated from the plasma membrane-targeted PpIX in the CNE2 cells can be escaped into the extracellular medium and to react with the SOSG to produce SOSG-EP, and the fluorescence enhancement of SOSG around the cells mainly depends on the intracellular PpIX. Our findings may be useful for further monitored the 1O2 that can be escaping from the living cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207