MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033427964 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.2254

Genetic Diversity in Natural Populations and Corresponding Seed Collections of Little Bluestem as Revealed by AFLP Markers

2004· article· en· W2033427964 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yong‐Bi Fu, Anh T. Phan, Bruce Coulman, K. W. Richards

Bibliographic record

VenueCrop Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBioenergy crop production and management
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplified fragment length polymorphismBiologyGenetic diversityGermplasmTiller (botany)Genetic variationPopulationBotanyAgronomyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Little bluestem [ Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash] is one of the most widespread native grasses in North America. Little is known about the genetic diversity of this species in natural populations and in seed collections. The amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) technique was applied to assess the comparative genetic diversity of six natural populations of little bluestem in Manitoba and Saskatchewan and their corresponding seed collections. Five AFLP primer pairs were employed to screen a total of 180 samples representing about 15 tillers per population and 15 seeds per collection, and 158 polymorphic AFLP bands were scored for each sample. Analyses of these scored bands revealed that >91% of the total AFLP variation was present within the natural populations and within the seed collections. The among‐population and among‐collection variation components, although relatively small (7–9%), were statistically significant from zero. Comparisons of AFLP profiles between the seed and tiller samples revealed the seed samples had fewer polymorphic bands, higher average band frequencies, and more bands with extremely high or low frequencies. A significant association of AFLP variation with geographical origin was detected in the seed, but not the tiller samples. These results indicate collecting seeds may not be as effective as collecting tillers in sampling genetic diversity from natural populations for the improvement of little bluestem germplasm for rangeland seeding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrop ScienceSame topicBioenergy crop production and managementFrench-language works237,207