Isolation of Tn<i>916</i>-like conjugal elements from swine lot effluent
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Isolates of Enterococcus faecalis obtained from a swine farrowing house outflow were examined for genetic elements similar to Tn916. Of the enterococci isolated, 71% were resistant to tetracycline. Among the tetracycline-resistant enterococci isolated from the outflow samples, approximately 34% were able to transfer the tetracycline resistance phenotype to Bacillus thuringiensis in cross-genus matings. The frequencies of transfer for 10 random isolates were comparable to those for transfer of Tn916 from E. faecalis to B. thuringiensis. In addition, these elements were shown to mobilize plasmid pC194 between Bacillus species, as did Tn916. Southern blot and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis showed these elements share extensive structural homology with Tn916. The selected conjugal elements were capable of transfer to a Bacillus recipient in a soil environment. When the swine waste was introduced into the soil, the tetracycline resistant fecal enterococci levels rose from essentially undetectable levels to approximately 4 x 10(4) and remained at this level for 4 weeks. After six months, including one winter, levels had decreased to 5 x 10(3).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".