Utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Methods Consecutive patients with resuscitated SCD or sustained were enrolled. Imaging was performed using either a 1.5 T or 3 T MRI scanner. Standard cine imaging was performed in serial short axis planes followed by T2-wighted turbo spin-echo imaging using a triple inversion recovery sequence (STIR) in the same planes. DE imaging was performed in matched slice orientations following the administration of 0.125 to 0.2 mmol/kg gadolinium intravenously. T1-weighted imaging (axial slices) was additionally performed in patients with LBBB morphology. All images were blindly interpreted using visual scoring. T2 and DE images were also evaluated by semiautomated quantitative techniques. Results 67 patients were enrolled (24 with SCD, 43 with) with a mean age of 51 ± 15 years. Myocardial disease was known to be present in 33 patients (49%); prior myocardial infarction (MI) in 18, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in 4 and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in 1. The mean ejection fraction (EF) was 53 ± 18% with 32 patients (48%) having an EF >55%. T2 weighted imaging was abnormal in 10 patients (15%) with findings consistent with acute myocarditis in 7 and ischemic injury in 3. DE imaging was abnormal in 35 patients (52%) with findings consistent with MI in 20, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in 9, myocarditis in 6 and sarcoidosis in 2. Two patients had a combined MI-HCM DE pattern. Of 15 patients enrolled with LBBB morphology the T1 weighted imaging was abnormal in 2. Overall, myocardial tissue disease was demonstrated by CMR in 41 patients (62%). A new myocardial disease or change in diagnosis was provided by CMR in 14 patients (21%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".