Wild chinook salmon survive better than hatchery salmon in a period of poor production
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The population dynamics of chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ) from the Cowichan River on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada are used by the Pacific Salmon Commission as an index of the general state of chinook salmon coast wide. In recent years the production declined to very low levels despite the use of a hatchery that was intended to increase production by improving the number of smolts entering the ocean. In 2008, we carried out an extensive study of the early marine survival of the hatchery and wild juvenile chinook salmon. We found that both rearing types mostly remained within the Gulf Islands study area during the period when most of the marine mortality occurred for the hatchery fish. By mid September, approximately 1.3% of all hatchery fish survived, compared to 7.8%–31.5% for wild fish. This six to 24 times difference in survival could negate an estimated increased egg-to-smolt survival of about 13% that is theorized to result through the use of a hatchery. Estimates of the early marine survival are approximate, but sufficient to show a dramatic difference in the response of the two rearing types to the marine nursery area. If the declining trend in production continues for both rearing types, modifications to the hatchery program are needed to improve survival or an emphasis on improving the abundances of wild stocks is necessary, or both. The discovery that the juvenile Cowichan River chinook salmon remain within a relatively confined area of the Gulf Islands within the Strait of Georgia offers an excellent opportunity to research the mechanisms that cause the early marine mortalities and hopefully contribute to a management that improves the production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".