Cationic organozinc complexes of a bis(phosphinimine) pincer ligand: synthesis, structural and polymerization studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cationic organozinc complexes of a neutral bis(phosphinimine) pincer ligand (L) have been prepared and structurally characterized. This recently introduced ligand was constructed from a dibenzofuran (dbf) framework with symmetric attachment of phosphinimine groups at the 4 and 6 positions. Starting from protonated derivatives [LH][B(C(6)F(5))(4)] (1a), [LH][BPh(4)] (1b), or [LH(2)][BPh(4)](2) (1c), the complexes [LZnCH(3)][B(C(6)F(5))(4)] (2a), [LZnCH(3)][BPh(4)] (2b), and [LZnOAc][BPh(4)] (3), were prepared via protonolysis of an appropriate alkylzinc precursor. The complex [LZnPh][BPh(4)] (4) is generated as a side-product in the synthesis of 2b. Solid-state structural studies have revealed the compounds to be charge separated cationic zinc species with 3-coordinate trigonal planar geometry. Preliminary studies have shown these complexes to be inactive for the polymerization of lactide. Upon modification of the initiating group to a methyl-(S)-lactate, however, complex [LZnOCH(Me)CO(2)Me][B(C(6)F(5))(4)] (5) demonstrated significant polymerization activity at 60 degrees C. Additionally, NMR and mass spectrometry data confirmed a coordination-insertion mechanism was operative for this catalyst.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".