Effect of molecular weight and charge density on the performance of polyacrylamide in low‐grade oil sand ore processing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The effect of charge density and molecular weight (MW) of partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) polymers on their performance in processing low‐grade oil sand ores was investigated. Bitumen extraction and tailings settling tests were carried out and an atomic force microscope (AFM) was used to directly measure the bitumen‐solid and solid‐solid interaction forces. It was found that HPAM polymers with a low MW acted as dispersants in the bitumen extraction process, resulting in low bitumen recovery and slow tailings settling but improved froth quality. In contrast, the use of HPAM polymers with a high MW improved both bitumen recovery and tailings settling but deteriorated froth quality. To achieve high bitumen recovery and fast tailings settling, a HPAM polymer must have a low to medium charge density (∼30%) and a high MW (17.5 million Daltons). A stronger clay‐bitumen adhesion force normally resulted in a lower bitumen recovery. Fast tailings settling was achieved in the presence of a strong solid‐solid adhesion force.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".