MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2033534218 · doi:10.1121/1.4744425

Interactive and aliasing-free acoustic modeling of reflections and diffractions in architectural environments

2001· article· en· W2033534218 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Funkhouser, Nicolas Tsingos, Ingrid Carlbom, Gary W. Elko, Gopal Pingali, Mohan Sondhi, Jim West

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic Technology and Sound Studies
Canadian institutionsBell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceReverberationRay tracing (physics)Specular reflectionAliasingBeam tracingAcoustic spaceAcousticsDiffractionBeam (structure)ComputationComputer graphics (images)Distributed ray tracingAlgorithmSound (geography)Rendering (computer graphics)Computer visionOpticsFilter (signal processing)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A primary challenge in geometrical acoustic modeling is computation of reverberation paths from sound sources fast enough for real-time auralization. This paper describes an aliasing-free beam tracing algorithm based on precomputed spatial subdivision and beam tree data structures that enables real-time acoustic modeling and auralization for sound sources in interactive applications. The proposed method traces convex polyhedral beams from the location of each sound source and receiver through a precomputed spatial subdivision data structure, constructing a beam tree representing the regions of space reachable by potential sequences of transmissions, diffractions, and specular reflections at surfaces of a 3D polygonal model. By computing beam trees asynchronously (off-line), our system can generate reverberation paths between sources and receivers at interactive rates and spatialize audio signals in real-time as sources and receivers move under interactive user control. Unlike previous geometrical acoustic modeling work, our beam tracing method: (1) supports evaluation of early reverberated paths at interactive rates, (2) scales well for large, densely occluded architectural environments, and (3) computes paths of diffraction without aliasing using the uniform theory of diffraction. This system is being used to develop interactive applications in which a user experiences a virtual environment immersively via simultaneous auralization and visualization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicMusic Technology and Sound StudiesFrench-language works237,207